Paper reviewer comments example
WebThe reviewers read the paper and provide comments, suggestions and a recommendation (reject, revise or accept). ... Sample comments. Please note that these are just examples of how you might provide feedback on an author’s work. You should, of course, always tailor your review to the paper in question and the specific requirements of the ... WebReviewer 4 comments: Comment: This is an excellent report dealing with significant technical matters. I find no fault whatsoever with the methods, data analysis, or …
Paper reviewer comments example
Did you know?
Webexample of cover letter that can go with y our resp onse to reviewers’ comments is pro vided. The specimen/template is made up of a set of parts, each of which is presented and described in a ...
Web1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above … WebApr 5, 2024 · For example, if the reviewer seems confused about something, improve the clarity in your paper. If you disagree with the reviewer, include better justification for …
WebFor example, instead of, “The explanation of the proposed mechanism is not clear. ” You might write, “The explanation of the proposed mechanism should be more detailed. … WebPeer review of journal articles and other technical reports is a key element in the maintenance of academic integrity. This article assists the reader in the efficient preparation of constructive reviews. The parts of a typical review are listed, as well as formats for the most common situations. Common defects of technical papers are discussed.
WebNov 3, 2024 · Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The present manuscript refers to the review on TVC studies using many previous existing results. If the authors want to publish …
WebSample peer review comments to reject a manuscript “I do not believe that this journal is a good fit for this paper.” “While the paper addresses an interesting issue, it is not … bumble bee nytWebMar 6, 2024 · One Step At a Time. When you are ready to start, a helpful approach is to resolve one comment at a time. Read it and understand what it is actually asking, and then make notes of how you will respond and what you will be required to do to make the changes in the manuscript. This process should be repeated for all of the comments … hale pcmh45Webimprove the work and address their concerns as per the specific comments below. As noted by the Reviewer, the authors feel that the length restraint of a Brief Communication … hale pawa\u0027a professional buildingWebThe response to reviewers is usually organized by presenting reviewers’ comments one by one, followed by the authors’ response. Authors should distinguish their responses from the reviewers’ comments by using phrases such as “author response” and/or a different font color. Then, each response should clearly explain the change made and ... bumble bee nursery schoolWebSep 30, 2014 · Reviewers might want to reject a paper that has errors in the affiliation information—in the third line of the manuscript itself . Consider the following inconsistency in affiliation information as an example: University of Wollongong, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Department, Australia bumble bee nytimesWebThe editors thought it was a study with a large sample size, and the manuscript was clearly written. They also made the following comments: E.2. Reviewer comment: Please consider specifying in the title that this ... 3.1. Reviewer comment: This is a beautifully analysed and written paper, with an important message. I would recommend publication ... bumble bee nz toyWebReviewer Comments to Author(s): Reviewer #1 (Jillon Vander Wal, PhD): Overall, this is a clear, concise, and well-written manuscript. The introduction is relevant and theory based. … bumble bee occasions azle tx